Calibrating the Tully-Fisher Relation to Measure the Hubble Constant
Daniel Scolnic, Paula Boubel, Jakob Byrne, Adam G. Riess, Gagandeep, S. Anand

TL;DR
This paper investigates systematic uncertainties in calibrating the Tully-Fisher relation for measuring the Hubble constant, proposing corrections that lead to a higher, more consistent value of H0 around 76 km/s/Mpc.
Contribution
It identifies and corrects calibration discrepancies in the Tully-Fisher method, reducing systematic errors and providing a more accurate estimate of the Hubble constant.
Findings
Corrected TRGB zeropoint reduces systematic error by a factor of two.
Revised H0 measurement is 76.3 km/s/Mpc with lower systematic uncertainty.
Most alternative distance indicators yield H0 > 73 km/s/Mpc.
Abstract
Boubel et al. 2024 (B24) recently used the Tully-Fisher (TF) relation to measure calibrated distances in the Hubble flow and found km/s/Mpc. The large systematic uncertainty was the result of propagating the conflict between two sources of empirical distance calibration: a difference in zeropoint when calibrating the TF relation with Type Ia supernovae (SNe Ia) versus Cepheids and Tip-of-the-Red-Giant-Branch (TRGB) and an apparent difference in zeropoint between two distinct TRGB datasets. We trace the SN Ia-based calibration used in the TF analysis to a study where was fixed to 70 km/s/Mpc rather than measured, (with host distances derived from redshifts and the Hubble law), thus introducing a discrepancy with the other empirically calibrated indicators. In addition, we trace the difference in TRGB zeropoints to a miscalibration of …
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsRelativity and Gravitational Theory · Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
