
TL;DR
This paper explores the concept of meaningfulness in AI systems, emphasizing the importance of clear definitions and measurements of 'meaning' to advance natural language understanding and address ethical considerations.
Contribution
It characterizes 'meaning' in computational terms and advocates for detaching from human-centric views to improve AI evaluation and discourse.
Findings
Highlights the confusion between models and phenomena
Calls for clearer definitions of 'meaning' in AI
Proposes a framework to analyze AI capabilities
Abstract
One goal of Artificial Intelligence is to learn meaningful representations for natural language expressions, but what this entails is not always clear. A variety of new linguistic behaviours present themselves embodied as computers, enhanced humans, and collectives with various kinds of integration and communication. But to measure and understand the behaviours generated by such systems, we must clarify the language we use to talk about them. Computational models are often confused with the phenomena they try to model and shallow metaphors are used as justifications for (or to hype) the success of computational techniques on many tasks related to natural language; thus implying their progress toward human-level machine intelligence without ever clarifying what that means. This paper discusses the challenges in the specification of "machines of meaning", machines capable of acquiring…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsEthics and Social Impacts of AI · Multimodal Machine Learning Applications · Language and cultural evolution
