
TL;DR
This paper explores the impact of the diffusion step distribution in diffusion models, revealing that relaxing the normality assumption enhances model flexibility and affects generated sample quality.
Contribution
It introduces a generalized diffusion framework by removing the normality assumption on step sizes, expanding the design space and training options for diffusion models.
Findings
Different step distributions produce qualitatively different samples
Generalized models improve density estimation and image generation
Invariance to step distribution as step size approaches zero
Abstract
Diffusion models generate samples by incrementally reversing a process that turns data into noise. We show that when the step size goes to zero, the reversed process is invariant to the distribution of these increments. This reveals a previously unconsidered parameter in the design of diffusion models: the distribution of the diffusion step . This parameter is implicitly set by default to be normally distributed in most diffusion models. By lifting this assumption, we generalize the framework for designing diffusion models and establish an expanded class of diffusion processes with greater flexibility in the choice of loss function used during training. We demonstrate the effectiveness of these models on density estimation and generative modeling tasks on standard image datasets, and show that different choices of the distribution of result…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsStochastic processes and financial applications · Statistical Methods and Inference
MethodsSparse Evolutionary Training · Diffusion
