Benchmark for Evaluation and Analysis of Citation Recommendation Models
Puja Maharjan

TL;DR
This paper introduces a benchmark dataset and standardized evaluation metrics to enable consistent comparison and analysis of various citation recommendation models, addressing current diversity in methods and datasets.
Contribution
The paper presents a comprehensive benchmark for citation recommendation models, facilitating standardized evaluation across different features and datasets in the field.
Findings
Provides a unified platform for model comparison
Enables evaluation of models on multiple citation features
Facilitates identification of promising approaches
Abstract
Citation recommendation systems have attracted much academic interest, resulting in many studies and implementations. These systems help authors automatically generate proper citations by suggesting relevant references based on the text they have written. However, the methods used in citation recommendation differ across various studies and implementations. Some approaches focus on the overall content of papers, while others consider the context of the citation text. Additionally, the datasets used in these studies include different aspects of papers, such as metadata, citation context, or even the full text of the paper in various formats and structures. The diversity in models, datasets, and evaluation metrics makes it challenging to assess and compare citation recommendation methods effectively. To address this issue, a standardized dataset and evaluation metrics are needed to…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsSemantic Web and Ontologies
MethodsFocus
