Little to lose: the case for a robust European green hydrogen strategy
Koen van Greevenbroek, Johannes Schmidt, Marianne Zeyringer, Alexander Horsch

TL;DR
This paper argues that Europe should set a 2040 green hydrogen target of around 25 Mt, which is cost-effective and enhances climate strategy robustness amid high uncertainty.
Contribution
It demonstrates that a 25 Mt target by 2040 is nearly cost-optimal across various scenarios using novel analysis methods.
Findings
A 25 Mt target is within 10% of cost-optimal in most scenarios.
Setting concrete targets reduces investment uncertainty.
Green hydrogen targets decrease reliance on CCS and imports.
Abstract
The EU targets 10 Mt of green hydrogen production by 2030, but has not committed to targets for 2040. Green hydrogen competes with carbon capture and storage, biomass and imports in reaching emissions reductions; earlier studies have demonstrated the great uncertainty in future cost-optimal development of green hydrogen. In spite of this, we show that Europe risks little by setting green hydrogen production targets at around 25 Mt by 2040. Employing an extensive scenario analysis combined with novel near-optimal techniques, we find that this target results in systems that are within 10% of cost-optimal in most considered scenarios. Setting concrete targets is important in order to resolve significant uncertainty which hampers investments. Targeting green hydrogen reduces the dependence on carbon capture and storage and green fuel imports, making for a more robust European climate…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsHybrid Renewable Energy Systems
