Consistent Value Assignments Can Explain Classicality
Giuseppe Nistic\`o

TL;DR
This paper proposes that classical behavior emerges from the possibility of consistent value assignments to quantum observables, challenging traditional views that focus on parameters like Planck's constant.
Contribution
It introduces a novel concept of evaluation enabling consistent value assignments to non-comeasurable observables, explaining classicality emergence.
Findings
Existence of evaluations for position and velocity in large rigid bodies
Classicality arises from overcoming non-comeasurability obstacles
Framework allows for consistent classical descriptions in quantum systems
Abstract
The present work proposes an alternative approach to the problem of the emergence of classicality. Typical approaches developed in the literature derive the classical behaviour of a quantum system from conditions that concern the value of the parameters deemed responsible of non-classicality, like Planck constant. Our first step in addressing the problem is instead to identify the physical origin of non-classicality of quantum physics. Nowadays the deepest origin is identified in the impossibility of a simultaneous consistent value assignment to every set of quantum observables. To attack this impossibility a concept of ``evaluation'' is then introduced, which allows for a consistent value assignment to non-comeasurable observables whenever an established set of conditions is satisfied. It is shown that in the case of the motion of the center of mass of a large rigid body evaluations…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsLogic, Reasoning, and Knowledge · Philosophy and History of Science
