Integrating Positionality Statements in Empirical Software Engineering Research
Breno Felix de Sousa, Ronnie de Souza Santos, Kiev Gama

TL;DR
This paper explores the understanding and use of positionality statements in software engineering research, emphasizing their role in promoting transparency and reflexivity, especially in diversity and inclusion studies.
Contribution
It is the first to systematically investigate the adoption and perceived value of positionality statements in empirical software engineering research.
Findings
Researchers recognize the importance of positionality statements for transparency.
Few studies currently include explicit positionality statements.
Positionality statements are valued for enhancing reflexivity and ethical considerations.
Abstract
Positionality statements are a reflective practice established in fields such as social sciences, where they enhance transparency, reflexivity, and ethical integrity by acknowledging how researchers identities, experiences, and perspectives may shape their work. This study aimed to investigate the understanding, usage, and potential value of positionality statements in software engineering research, particularly in studies focused on diversity and inclusion.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsSoftware Engineering Techniques and Practices · Software Engineering Research · Advanced Software Engineering Methodologies
