A cautionary tale on the cost-effectiveness of collaborative AI in real-world medical applications
Francesco Cremonesi, Lucia Innocenti, Sebastien Ourselin, Vicky Goh,, Michela Antonelli, Marco Lorenzi

TL;DR
This paper benchmarks federated learning and consensus-based learning in medical AI, showing CBL as a cost-effective alternative with comparable accuracy but significantly lower training time and communication costs.
Contribution
It provides the first extensive benchmark comparing FL and CBL across diverse medical datasets, highlighting CBL's efficiency advantages.
Findings
CBL achieves similar accuracy to FL.
CBL reduces training time by 15-fold.
CBL decreases communication costs by 60-fold.
Abstract
Background. Federated learning (FL) has gained wide popularity as a collaborative learning paradigm enabling collaborative AI in sensitive healthcare applications. Nevertheless, the practical implementation of FL presents technical and organizational challenges, as it generally requires complex communication infrastructures. In this context, consensus-based learning (CBL) may represent a promising collaborative learning alternative, thanks to the ability of combining local knowledge into a federated decision system, while potentially reducing deployment overhead. Methods. In this work we propose an extensive benchmark of the accuracy and cost-effectiveness of a panel of FL and CBL methods in a wide range of collaborative medical data analysis scenarios. The benchmark includes 7 different medical datasets, encompassing 3 machine learning tasks, 8 different data modalities, and…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsPrivacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
