An inferential measure of dependence between two systems using Bayesian model comparison
Guillaume Marrelec, Alain Giron

TL;DR
This paper introduces a Bayesian model comparison approach to measure dependence between two systems, providing a probabilistic quantification of the evidence for dependence based on observed data.
Contribution
It proposes a novel Bayesian dependence measure, $B(X,Y|D)$, that quantifies the evidence for dependence as a posterior probability, and explores its properties and advantages over traditional measures.
Findings
$B(X,Y|D)$ quantifies dependence as a posterior probability.
The measure is robust to noise and sensitive to dependence intensity.
It shares similarities with mutual information but offers a Bayesian interpretability.
Abstract
We propose to quantify dependence between two systems and in a dataset based on the Bayesian comparison of two models: one, , of statistical independence and another one, , of dependence. In this framework, dependence between and in , denoted , is quantified as , the posterior probability for the model of dependence given , or any strictly increasing function thereof. It is therefore a measure of the evidence for dependence between and as modeled by and observed in . We review several statistical models and reconsider standard results in the light of as a measure of dependence. Using simulations, we focus on two specific issues: the effect of noise and the behavior of when has a parameter coding for the intensity of dependence. We then derive some general properties of ,…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsInnovation Diffusion and Forecasting
MethodsFocus
