How many continuous measurements are needed to learn a vector?
David Krieg, Erich Novak, Mario Ullrich

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates that a surprisingly small number of adaptive continuous measurements suffices to accurately recover vectors in high-dimensional spaces, with implications for infinite-dimensional approximation.
Contribution
It introduces a novel measurement strategy that requires only logarithmically many measurements for vector recovery, advancing understanding of measurement efficiency.
Findings
Recovery with $oxed{ ext{logarithmic in } m}$ measurements is possible.
Adaptive measurements outperform non-adaptive methods.
Applications extend to infinite-dimensional approximation problems.
Abstract
One can recover vectors from with arbitrary precision, using only continuous measurements that are chosen adaptively. This surprising result is explained and discussed, and we present applications to infinite-dimensional approximation problems.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsFault Detection and Control Systems · Neural Networks and Applications
