Simulating Human-like Daily Activities with Desire-driven Autonomy
Yiding Wang, Yuxuan Chen, Fangwei Zhong, Long Ma, Yizhou Wang

TL;DR
This paper presents a Desire-driven Autonomous Agent (D2A) that enables large language models to autonomously generate human-like daily activities based on multi-dimensional desires, improving behavioral diversity and contextual relevance.
Contribution
The paper introduces a novel desire-driven framework for LLM agents, inspired by human needs, allowing autonomous task proposal and selection without explicit instructions.
Findings
Generates coherent and contextually relevant daily activities.
Exhibits variability and adaptability similar to humans.
Enhances rationality of activity simulation compared to other LLM agents.
Abstract
Desires motivate humans to interact autonomously with the complex world. In contrast, current AI agents require explicit task specifications, such as instructions or reward functions, which constrain their autonomy and behavioral diversity. In this paper, we introduce a Desire-driven Autonomous Agent (D2A) that can enable a large language model (LLM) to autonomously propose and select tasks, motivated by satisfying its multi-dimensional desires. Specifically, the motivational framework of D2A is mainly constructed by a dynamic Value System, inspired by the Theory of Needs. It incorporates an understanding of human-like desires, such as the need for social interaction, personal fulfillment, and self-care. At each step, the agent evaluates the value of its current state, proposes a set of candidate activities, and selects the one that best aligns with its intrinsic motivations. We conduct…
Peer Reviews
Decision·ICLR 2025 Poster
Originality: The paper presents a novel approach to simulating human-like daily activities using a desire-driven framework inspired by Maslow’s hierarchy of needs. Unlike traditional AI agents that rely on specific instructions or task-based rewards, the Desire-driven Autonomous Agent (D2A) framework introduces intrinsic motivation as the driving factor. This approach is unique in that it models a human-like motivational system, enabling the agent to select actions autonomously based on intrinsi
There are a few weaknesses. In Section 3, Problem Formulation, the math is not very clear, and it is also not explained in more detail how the activity distribution could be generated. In Section 6.3.1, Naturalness, Coherence and Plausibility are used to evaluate the activity sequences, but these three dimensions seem to have been picked arbitrarily and I am not sure if they are enough to rigorously test the outputs. Evaluation is done using GPT-4o but how are we to ensure that these evaluatio
## Originality The paper is quite original, as I have not seen Maslow's hierarchy of needs used in the context of a text agent. ## Quality The paper is well-written, experiments are quite well-designed, several seeds are provided to account for variability. The figures are nice, and the main one does a good job of summarizing how the agent works. The results of the paper support the claims made in the introduction and the abstract. ## Clarity The paper was easy to follow and the points are
* I am not completely convinced of the end-goal of this paper, specifically, building sequences of human activities. I see the authors justifying this goal in the potential for generating data for psychological, economic or sociological academic study. However, the validity of the generated behavior with respect to at least one downstream application is not investigated in the paper. How to make sure the data generated is useful in these contexts? * The introduction also briefly argues that buil
- The proposed framework allows agents to operate based on intrinsic motivations, which is a significant departure from existing task-oriented AI agents that rely on explicit instructions or external rewards. - The paper is well written and has nice figures. - The authors conducted a comprehensive comparative analysis with three baseline approaches (ReAct, BabyAGI, and LLMob) to evaluate the effectiveness of their framework. The development of a flexible text-based activity simulator using Conc
I think there are some weaknesses in this paper: - Limited Technological Innovation. The paper primarily focuses on the conceptual framework and theoretical underpinnings of the desire-driven autonomy approach. While the idea of using intrinsic motivations inspired by Maslow's theory of needs is innovative, the technological implementation details might not be as groundbreaking or novel within the recent advancements in the field of AI and LLMs. The work seems in the flow of LLM agents, while I
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsHuman Motion and Animation
