Modeling Multi-Objective Tradeoffs with Monotonic Utility Functions
Edward Chen, Natalie Dullerud, Thomas Niedermayr, Elizabeth Kidd, Ransalu Senanayake, Pang Wei Koh, Sanmi Koyejo, Carlos Guestrin

TL;DR
The paper presents a new two-step method for efficiently selecting Pareto-optimal solutions in multi-objective optimization that align with user preferences expressed as monotonic utility functions.
Contribution
It introduces a principled framework that samples and sparsifies Pareto front regions based on user-defined utility functions, demonstrated with soft-hard functions across diverse applications.
Findings
Our approach yields solutions with over 3% higher utility in brachytherapy.
A small set of 5 points captures over 99% of the utility of dense samples.
The method outperforms existing approaches in multiple domains.
Abstract
Countless science and engineering applications in multi-objective optimization (MOO) necessitate that decision-makers (DMs) select a Pareto-optimal (PO) solution which aligns with their preferences. Evaluating individual solutions is often expensive, and the high-dimensional trade-off space makes exhaustive exploration of the full Pareto frontier (PF) infeasible. We introduce a novel, principled two-step process for obtaining a compact set of PO points that aligns with user preferences, which are specified a priori as general monotonic utility functions (MFs). Our process (1) densely samples the user's region of interest on the PF, then (2) sparsifies the results into a small, diverse set for the DM. We instantiate this framework with soft-hard functions (SHFs), an intuitive class of MFs that operationalizes the common expert heuristic of imposing soft and hard bounds. We provide…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
