
TL;DR
This paper critically examines the existence of $Qq$ diquarks, arguing they likely do not exist, and proposes studying pre-asymptotic corrections in heavy baryon decays as a way to confirm this.
Contribution
The paper provides a theoretical review of diquark concepts and suggests a novel approach to test their existence through decay analysis of heavy baryons.
Findings
Arguments against the existence of $Qq$ diquarks with sufficiently heavy $Q$
Proposes studying pre-asymptotic corrections in $Qqq$ baryon decays
Highlights differences in $cq$ attraction effects between charm and bottom baryons
Abstract
In connection with recent discoveries of heavy-quark containing exotic states publications discussing diquarks ( stand for a heavy and light quarks, respectively) proliferated in the literature. After a brief summary of the diquark concept I review various general reasons why the diquark (with sufficinetly heavy ) does not exist. Then I argue (this is the focus of my talk) that the most direct way to confirm non-existence of the diquarks is the study of pre-asymptotic corrections in the inclusive decays of baryons, e.g. . Since the quarks are much lighter than , namely, , traces of the attraction in the color anti-triplet spin-0 state may or may not be present in the baryons.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsCold Atom Physics and Bose-Einstein Condensates · Molecular spectroscopy and chirality · Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions
