Probabilistic Finite Automaton Emptiness is Undecidable for a Fixed Automaton
G\"unter Rote

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates that the emptiness problem for probabilistic finite automata is undecidable even with a fixed automaton, using reductions from the Post Correspondence Problem, and explores variations with different alphabet sizes and output values.
Contribution
It proves the undecidability of PFA emptiness for a fixed automaton with minimal states and alphabet, extending understanding of automata decision problems.
Findings
Undecidability of PFA emptiness with 7 states and 5-symbol alphabet.
Binary alphabet restriction increases the number of states needed.
Allowing rational outputs reduces the number of states to 6.
Abstract
We construct a probabilistic finite automaton (PFA) with 7 states and an input alphabet of 5 symbols for which the PFA Emptiness Problem is undecidable. The only input for the decision problem is the starting distribution. For the proof, we use reductions from special instances of the Post Correspondence Problem. We also consider some variations: The input alphabet of the PFA can be restricted to a binary alphabet at the expense of a larger number of states. If we allow a rational output value for each state instead of a yes-no acceptance decision, the number of states can even be reduced to 6.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsMachine Learning and Algorithms · Formal Methods in Verification · semigroups and automata theory
