Beta delayed neutron emission of $N=84$ $^{132}$Cd
M. Madurga, Z.Y. Xu,1 R. Grzywacz, M.R. Mumpower, A. Andreyev, G. Benzoni, M.J.G. Borge, C. Costache, I. Cox, S. Cupp, B. Dimitrov, P. Van Duppen, L.M. Fraile, S. Franchoo, H. Fynbo, B. Gonsalves, A. Gottardo, P.T. Greenless, A. Gross, C.J. Gross, L.J. Harkness-Brennan, M. Hyuse

TL;DR
This study combines experimental measurements and large-scale shell model calculations to analyze beta-delayed neutron emission in $^{132}$Cd, providing insights into nuclear decay processes relevant for astrophysics.
Contribution
The paper presents new experimental data on $^{132}$Cd decay and compares it with advanced shell model calculations, highlighting the limitations of existing global models.
Findings
Calculated half-lives and neutron branching ratios agree with known data.
Models overestimate half-lives of nuclei with $Z<50$ and $N extgreater=82$.
Shell model offers improved predictions for astrophysical nuclei.
Abstract
Using the time-of-flight technique, we measured the beta-delayed neutron emission of Cd. From our large-scale shell model (LSSM) calculation using the NLO interaction [Z.Y. Xu et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 022501 (2023)], we suggest the decay is dominated by the transformation of a neutron in the orbital, deep below the Fermi surface, into a proton in the orbital. We compare the beta-decay half-lives and neutron branching ratios of nuclei with and obtained with our LSSM with those of leading "global" models such as Finite-Range Droplet Model (FRDM). Our calculations match known half-lives and neutron branching ratios well and suggest that current leading models overestimate the yet-to-be-measured half-lives. Our model, backed by the Cd decay data presented here, offers robust predictive power for nuclei of astrophysical interest…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
