Further analysis on the second frequency of union-closed set families
Saintan Wu

TL;DR
This paper investigates conditions under which Nagel's strengthened union-closed sets conjecture fails for the case k=2, using linear programming methods to analyze specific family structures.
Contribution
It provides a detailed analysis of when Nagel's conjecture does not hold for k=2, extending previous results with a linear programming approach.
Findings
Identifies specific cases where Nagel's conjecture fails for k=2
Uses linear programming to analyze union-closed set families
Extends understanding of the conjecture's limitations
Abstract
The Union-Closed Sets Conjecture, also known as Frankl's conjecture, asks whether, for any union-closed set family with sets, there is an element that lies in at least sets in . In 2022, Nagel posed a stronger conjecture that within any union-closed family whose ground set size is at least , there are always elements in the ground set that appear in at least proportion of the sets in the family. Das and Wu showed that this conjecture is true for and if is outside a particular range. In this companion paper, we analyse further when fails Nagel's conjecture for via linear programming.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsMathematical Dynamics and Fractals · semigroups and automata theory · Nonlinear Differential Equations Analysis
