An even simpler hard variant of Not-All-Equal 3-SAT
Andreas Darmann, Janosch D\"ocker, Britta Dorn

TL;DR
This paper investigates the computational complexity of a restricted version of Not-All-Equal 3-SAT, showing NP-completeness for certain parameters and polynomial-time solvability for others, with implications for hypergraph coloring.
Contribution
It establishes NP-completeness for k-partitioned instances with k≥4 and polynomial-time solvability for k≤3, refining previous results and connecting to hypergraph bicolorability.
Findings
NP-completeness for k≥4 partitions
Polynomial-time solvability for k≤3
Hypergraph bicolorability complexity results
Abstract
We show that Not-All-Equal 3-Sat remains NP-complete when restricted to instances that simultaneously satisfy the following properties: (i) The clauses are given as the disjoint union of k partitions, for any fixed , of the variable set into subsets of size 3, and (ii) each pair of distinct clauses shares at most one variable. Property (i) implies that each variable appears in exactly clauses and each clause consists of exactly 3 unnegated variables. Therewith, we improve upon our earlier result (Darmann and D\"ocker, 2020). Complementing the hardness result for at least partitions, we show that for the corresponding decision problem is in P. In particular, for , all instances that satisfy Property (i) are nae-satisfiable. By the well-known correspondence between Not-All-Equal 3-Sat and hypergraph coloring, we obtain the following corollary of…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsScheduling and Optimization Algorithms
