When can we see micromotion? Experimental and theoretical analysis of the ChiSCAT scheme
Andrii Trelin, Jette Abel, Christian Rimmbach, Robert David, Andreas, Hermann, Friedemann Reinhard

TL;DR
This paper provides both experimental and theoretical insights into the ChiSCAT interferometric microscopy scheme, enhancing detection of cellular micromotion under various noise conditions and proposing improvements for robustness.
Contribution
It offers a comprehensive analysis of ChiSCAT's performance with low-coherence illumination and noise modeling, advancing the understanding of micromotion detection in biological samples.
Findings
Low-coherence illumination improves robustness to vibrations
ChiSCAT performance varies with different noise models
Proposed methods enhance detection in cell motion-dominated environments
Abstract
We present an in-depth analysis of ChiSCAT, a recently introduced interferometric microscopy scheme to detect recurring micromotion events in cells. Experimentally, we demonstrate that illumination with low-coherence sources can greatly improve the robustness of the scheme to vibrations. Theoretically, we analyze the performance of ChiSCAT under various noise models, in particular photon shot noise and noise dominated by cellular motions other than the signal. We finally propose ways to improve performance, especially in a setting dominated by cell motions, and conclude with an outlook on potential future directions.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsCardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
