Chow-Lam Recovery
Elizabeth Pratt, Kristian Ranestad

TL;DR
This paper investigates the conditions for recovering subvarieties of Grassmannians from their Chow-Lam forms, extending classical results and identifying cases where recovery is impossible.
Contribution
It provides necessary conditions for recovery and presents examples where recovery fails, advancing understanding beyond the classical projective space case.
Findings
Recovery always possible for projective space (Chow 1937)
Necessary conditions for recovery in general Grassmannians
Examples showing recovery is not always possible
Abstract
We study the conditions under which a subvariety of the Grassmannian may be recovered from certain of its linear projections. In the special case that our Grassmannian is projective space, this is equivalent to asking when a variety can be recovered from its Chow form; the answer is "always" by work of Chow in 1937. In the general Grassmannian setting, the analogous question is when a variety can be recovered from its Chow-Lam form. We give both necessary conditions for recovery and families of examples where, in contrast with the projective case, recovery is not possible.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsCambodian History and Society
