Class-wise Autoencoders Measure Classification Difficulty And Detect Label Mistakes
Jacob Marks, Brent A. Griffin, Jason J. Corso

TL;DR
This paper presents a novel autoencoder-based framework that measures classification difficulty and detects label mistakes by analyzing reconstruction error ratios across classes, correlating well with model error rates and mislabel detection.
Contribution
It introduces reconstruction error ratios (RERs) as a new method to analyze dataset difficulty and identify label errors, providing a systematic and interpretable approach.
Findings
RERs strongly correlate with classification error rates.
RERs effectively detect label mistakes under various noise conditions.
The framework applies across multiple visual datasets.
Abstract
We introduce a new framework for analyzing classification datasets based on the ratios of reconstruction errors between autoencoders trained on individual classes. This analysis framework enables efficient characterization of datasets on the sample, class, and entire dataset levels. We define reconstruction error ratios (RERs) that probe classification difficulty and allow its decomposition into (1) finite sample size and (2) Bayes error and decision-boundary complexity. Through systematic study across 19 popular visual datasets, we find that our RER-based dataset difficulty probe strongly correlates with error rate for state-of-the-art (SOTA) classification models. By interpreting sample-level classification difficulty as a label mistakenness score, we further find that RERs achieve SOTA performance on mislabel detection tasks on hard datasets under symmetric and asymmetric label…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsMachine Learning and Data Classification
