You (Almost) Can't Beat Brute Force for 3-Matroid Intersection
Ilan Doron-Arad, Ariel Kulik, Hadas Shachnai

TL;DR
This paper proves that for the $ ext{l}$-matroid intersection problem, brute force algorithms are essentially optimal, and it provides new algorithms and lower bounds that deepen understanding of the problem's computational complexity.
Contribution
The paper establishes tight bounds on the runtime of algorithms for $ ext{l}$-matroid intersection, showing brute force cannot be significantly improved and introducing a generalized local search technique.
Findings
Brute force cannot be significantly improved for $ ext{l}$-matroid intersection.
An algorithm faster than brute force by a polylogarithmic factor is presented.
A parameterized lower bound based on the matroid rank is established.
Abstract
The -matroid intersection (-MI) problem asks if given matroids share a common basis. Already for , notable canonical NP-complete special cases are -Dimensional Matching and Hamiltonian Path on directed graphs. However, while these problems admit exponential-time algorithms that improve the simple brute force, the fastest known algorithm for -MI is exactly brute force with runtime , where is the number of elements. Our first result shows that in fact, brute force cannot be significantly improved, by ruling out an algorithm for -MI with runtime , for any fixed . We further obtain: (i) an algorithm that solves -MI faster than brute force in time (ii) a parameterized running time lower bound of $2^{(\ell-2)…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsSoftware Testing and Debugging Techniques · Advanced Surface Polishing Techniques · Advanced Measurement and Metrology Techniques
