Main problems in constructing quantum theory based on finite mathematics
Felix M. Lev

TL;DR
This paper explores the differences between standard quantum theory and finite mathematics-based quantum theory, highlighting how the latter's higher symmetry and IR properties challenge traditional concepts like particles and antiparticles.
Contribution
It introduces simplified models to derive fundamental properties of quantum theories based on finite mathematics, emphasizing the implications for particle-antiparticle concepts.
Findings
FQT's IRs contain states with both energy signs.
In FQT, symmetry is higher than in SQT.
Particle-antiparticle concepts are approximations in FQT.
Abstract
As shown in our publications, quantum theory based on a finite ring of characteristic (FQT) is more general than standard quantum theory (SQT) because the latter is a degenerate case of the former in the formal limit . One of the main differences between SQT and FQT is the following. In SQT, elementary objects are described by irreducible representations (IRs) of a symmetry algebra in which energies are either only positive or only negative and there are no IRs where there are states with different signs of energy. In the first case, objects are called particles, and in the second - antiparticles. As a consequence, in SQT it is possible to introduce conserved quantum numbers (electric charge, baryon number, etc.) so that particles and antiparticles differ in the signs of these numbers. However, in FQT, all IRs necessarily contain states with both signs of energy. The…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
