Transfer Learning for Control Systems via Neural Simulation Relations
Alireza Nadali, Bingzhuo Zhong, Ashutosh Trivedi, Majid Zamani

TL;DR
This paper introduces neural simulation relations to transfer control policies between systems without requiring complete models, ensuring behavioral similarity and correctness proofs through a data-driven, model-free approach.
Contribution
It proposes neural simulation relations for transfer learning in control systems, enabling model-free, data-driven transfer of controllers with behavioral guarantees.
Findings
Successfully transferred control policies between different systems.
Eliminated need for complete system models and post-verification.
Validated approach on vehicle and inverted pendulum case studies.
Abstract
Transfer learning is an umbrella term for machine learning approaches that leverage knowledge gained from solving one problem (the source domain) to improve speed, efficiency, and data requirements in solving a different but related problem (the target domain). The performance of the transferred model in the target domain is typically measured via some notion of loss function in the target domain. This paper focuses on effectively transferring control logic from a source control system to a target control system while providing approximately similar behavioral guarantees in both domains. However, in the absence of a complete characterization of behavioral specifications, this problem cannot be captured in terms of loss functions. To overcome this challenge, we use (approximate) simulation relations to characterize observational equivalence between the behaviors of two systems.…
Peer Reviews
Decision·Submitted to ICLR 2025
The paper presents the proposed algorithm with rigorous definitions and propositions. The proposed algorithm nicely transforms to reasonable loss functions to train the neural networks $V$ and $\mathcal{K}$. In addition, the author rigorously proved that the resultant neural simulation relation is an $\epsilon$-approximate simulation.
1. The experiments, though demonstrated $||y - \hat{y}$<\epsilon$ for the observed trajectories and plotted the trajectories, lacks comparison to relevant baselines. Given that the proposed transfer learning algorithm relies on the discretization of the state space, several transfer learning algorithms mentioned in the original paper's reference, even requiring access to the dynamical model, could be compared with by approximating or learning the system dynamics in local regions. 2. The robustne
The paper proposes to use neural networks to tackle a difficult problem using methods from machine learning.
- V seems to take the role of a simulation function. It is formulated such that it is amenable to learning using a loss function, but it is not immediately clear why this should work better than a direct approximation of a simulation function. - The use of the cross entropy loss should be better motivated; it's not immediately clear to me why that would be the best choice. - The experiments are not convincing. The first one is extremely simple, yet seems to require a surprising amount of computa
The proposed framework can be understood as addressing the domain gap (between the source and target systems) by transfer learning.
1. As stated in paragraphs 1 and 2 of the Introduction, the safety of a real physical system is a critical motivation behind the proposed work. The design aims to render the target system (e.g., a real system) and source system (e.g., a simulator) have similar behavior, such that the control policy of a source system can be deployed to real systems. A critical limitation is that the controllers of source systems must be verifiable safe; otherwise, you cannot guarantee their safety in target syst
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsNeural Networks and Applications · Model Reduction and Neural Networks
