Nonuniqueness of lattice Boltzmann schemes derived from finite difference methods
Eliane Kummer, Stephan Simonis

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates that multiple lattice Boltzmann schemes can correspond to the same finite difference scheme, challenging the idea of a unique lattice Boltzmann formulation for a given finite difference scheme.
Contribution
It provides counterexamples showing nonuniqueness and introduces the concept of equivalence classes for discretized relaxation systems.
Findings
Counterexamples of nonuniqueness in lattice Boltzmann schemes
Existence of equivalence classes for discretized relaxation systems
Challenges the conjecture of unique lattice Boltzmann formulations
Abstract
Recently, the construction of finite difference schemes from lattice Boltzmann schemes has been rigorously analyzed [Bellotti et al. (2022), Numer. Math. 152, pp. 1-40]. It is thus known that any lattice Boltzmann scheme can be expressed in terms of a corresponding multi-step finite difference scheme on the conserved variables. In the present work, we provide counterexamples for the conjecture that any multi-step finite difference scheme has a unique lattice Boltzmann formulation. Based on that, we indicate the existence of equivalence classes for discretized relaxation systems.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsLattice Boltzmann Simulation Studies · Aerosol Filtration and Electrostatic Precipitation · Image and Signal Denoising Methods
