The MeerKAT Pulsar Timing Array: The $4.5$-year data release and the noise and stochastic signals of the millisecond pulsar population
Matthew T. Miles, Ryan M. Shannon, Daniel J. Reardon, Matthew Bailes,, David J. Champion, Marisa Geyer, Pratyasha Gitika, Kathrin Grunthal, Michael, J. Keith, Michael Kramer, Atharva D. Kulkarni, Rowina S. Nathan, Aditya, Parthasarathy, Nataliya K. Porayko, Jaikhomba Singha

TL;DR
This paper presents the second data release and detailed noise analysis of the MeerKAT Pulsar Timing Array, detecting a common stochastic signal potentially related to gravitational waves, with implications for future sensitivity forecasts.
Contribution
It provides the first detailed noise analysis of MeerKAT PTA data and reports the detection of a common stochastic signal consistent with gravitational wave background predictions.
Findings
Detected a common stochastic process with specific amplitude and spectral index.
Measured the amplitude of the signal larger than other PTA experiments.
Forecasted sensitivity to gravitational wave background based on current results.
Abstract
Pulsar timing arrays are ensembles of regularly observed millisecond pulsars timed to high precision. Each pulsar in an array could be affected by a suite of noise processes, most of which are astrophysically motivated. Analysing them carefully can be used to understand these physical processes. However, the primary purpose of these experiments is to detect signals that are common to all pulsars, in particular signals associated with a stochastic gravitational wave background. To detect this, it is paramount to appropriately characterise other signals that may otherwise impact array sensitivity or cause a spurious detection. Here we describe the second data release and first detailed noise analysis of the pulsars in the MeerKAT Pulsar Timing Array, comprising high-cadence and high-precision observations of millisecond pulsars over years. We use this analysis to search for a…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
