LLMs Faithfully and Iteratively Compute Answers During CoT: A Systematic Analysis With Multi-step Arithmetics
Keito Kudo, Yoichi Aoki, Tatsuki Kuribayashi, Shusaku Sone, Masaya Taniguchi, Ana Brassard, Keisuke Sakaguchi, Kentaro Inui

TL;DR
This paper systematically analyzes how large language models perform multi-step arithmetic reasoning during chain-of-thought processes, revealing that models compute answers dynamically during reasoning, which enhances faithfulness of explanations.
Contribution
It provides a detailed investigation into the internal reasoning process of LLMs during CoT, showing they compute answers on the fly rather than beforehand, improving interpretability.
Findings
LLMs compute answers dynamically during reasoning.
Generated chains faithfully reflect internal computations.
Answer determination often occurs during reasoning, not before.
Abstract
This study investigates the internal information flow of large language models (LLMs) while performing chain-of-thought (CoT) style reasoning. Specifically, with a particular interest in the faithfulness of the CoT explanation to LLMs' final answer, we explore (i) when the LLMs' answer is (pre)determined, especially before the CoT begins or after, and (ii) how strongly the information from CoT specifically has a causal effect on the final answer. Our experiments with controlled arithmetic tasks reveal a systematic internal reasoning mechanism of LLMs. They have not derived an answer at the moment when input was fed into the model. Instead, they compute (sub-)answers while generating the reasoning chain on the fly. Therefore, the generated reasoning chains can be regarded as faithful reflections of the model's internal computation.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsArtificial Intelligence in Law · Digital Rights Management and Security
