Multiple Testing in Generalized Universal Inference
Neil Dey, Ryan Martin, Jonathan P. Williams

TL;DR
This paper introduces a distribution-free method for multiple hypothesis testing using generalized universal inference and e-values, ensuring valid error control without distributional assumptions, demonstrated through simulations in quantile regression.
Contribution
It combines generalized universal inference with the e-BH procedure to control error rates in multiple testing without relying on distributional assumptions.
Findings
Valid error control demonstrated in simulations
Method maintains power in multiple testing scenarios
Applicable to risk minimization problems like quantile regression
Abstract
Compared to p-values, e-values provably guarantee safe, valid inference. If the goal is to test multiple hypotheses simultaneously, one can construct e-values for each individual test and then use the recently developed e-BH procedure to properly correct for multiplicity. Standard e-value constructions, however, require distributional assumptions that may not be justifiable. This paper demonstrates that the generalized universal inference framework can be used along with the e-BH procedure to control frequentist error rates in multiple testing when the quantities of interest are minimizers of risk functions, thereby avoiding the need for distributional assumptions. We demonstrate the validity and power of this approach via a simulation study, testing the significance of a predictor in quantile regression.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsStatistical Methods and Inference
