Handling irresolvable conflicts in the Semantic Web: an RDF-based conflict-tolerant version of the Deontic Traditional Scheme
Livio Robaldo, Gianluca Pozzato

TL;DR
This paper introduces an RDF-based ontology for the Semantic Web that handles irresolvable conflicts in deontic logic, enabling reasoning about conflicting obligations, prohibitions, and permissions in a unified framework.
Contribution
It presents the first comprehensive RDF and SPARQL implementation of the Deontic Traditional Scheme capable of managing irresolvable conflicts and various deontic modalities.
Findings
Framework formalizes all deontic modalities in RDF
Handles irresolvable conflicts and violations
Includes Java implementation and examples
Abstract
This paper presents a new ontology that implements the well-known Deontic Traditional Scheme in RDFs and SPARQL, fit to handle irresolvable conflicts, i.e., situations in which two or more statements prescribe conflicting obligations, prohibitions, or permissions, with none of them being "stronger" than the other one(s). In our view, this paper marks a significant advancement in standard theoretical research in formal Deontic Logic. Most contemporary approaches in this field are confined to the propositional level, mainly focus on the notion of obligation, and lack implementations. The proposed framework is encoded in RDF, which is not only a first-order language but also the most widely used knowledge representation language, as it forms the foundation of the Semantic Web. Moreover, the proposed computational ontology formalizes all deontic modalities defined in the Deontic Traditional…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsSemantic Web and Ontologies · Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation
MethodsOntology · Focus
