A Comparative Analysis of Vulnerability Management Tools: Evaluating Nessus, Acunetix, and Nikto for Risk Based Security Solutions
Swetha B, Susmitha NRK, Thirulogaveni J, Sruthi S

TL;DR
This paper compares Nessus, Acunetix, and Nikto vulnerability management tools, evaluating their detection accuracy, risk scoring, usability, automation, performance, and cost to aid organizations in selecting suitable security solutions.
Contribution
It provides a detailed comparative analysis of three popular vulnerability management tools, highlighting their strengths and weaknesses for risk-based security strategies.
Findings
Nessus shows high detection accuracy and comprehensive reporting.
Acunetix excels in web application vulnerability detection.
Nikto offers a cost-effective solution with decent performance.
Abstract
The evolving threat landscape in cybersecurity necessitates the adoption of advanced tools for effective vulnerability management. This paper presents a comprehensive comparative analysis of three widely used tools: Nessus, Acunetix, and Nikto. Each tool is assessed based on its detection accuracy, risk scoring using the Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS), ease of use, automation and reporting capabilities, performance metrics, and cost effectiveness. The research addresses the challenges faced by organizations in selecting the most suitable tool for their unique security requirements.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsInformation and Cyber Security
