Online versus Offline Adversaries in Property Testing
Esty Kelman, Ephraim Linder, Sofya Raskhodnikova

TL;DR
This paper compares property testing under offline and online adversarial models, revealing significant differences in query and randomness complexities, and introduces new properties demonstrating these separations.
Contribution
It establishes the incomparability of offline and online models in query complexity and introduces properties that show exponential randomness complexity separation.
Findings
Offline and online models are incomparable in query complexity.
Existence of properties testable with few queries online but requiring many offline.
Exponential increase in randomness needed for online testing of certain properties.
Abstract
We study property testing with incomplete or noisy inputs. The models we consider allow for adversarial manipulation of the input, but differ in whether the manipulation can be done only offline, i.e., before the execution of the algorithm, or online, i.e., as the algorithm runs. The manipulations by an adversary can come in the form of erasures or corruptions. We compare the query complexity and the randomness complexity of property testing in the offline and online models. Kalemaj, Raskhodnikova, and Varma (Theory Comput `23) provide properties that can be tested with a small number of queries with offline erasures, but cannot be tested at all with online erasures. We demonstrate that the two models are incomparable in terms of query complexity: we construct properties that can be tested with a constant number of queries in the online corruption model, but require querying a…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
