Politicians vs ChatGPT. A study of presuppositions in French and Italian political communication
Davide Garassino, Vivana Masia, Nicola Brocca, Alice Delorme Benites

TL;DR
This study compares political texts from French and Italian politicians with ChatGPT 3.5 outputs, analyzing presuppositions to understand linguistic features of manipulation and pragmatic competence in language models.
Contribution
It introduces a cross-linguistic analysis of presuppositions in political discourse and ChatGPT outputs, highlighting the models' pragmatic capabilities.
Findings
ChatGPT 3.5 replicates presupposition patterns in political texts.
Presupposition use varies between French and Italian political communication.
Implications for understanding LLMs' pragmatic and manipulative potential.
Abstract
This paper aims to provide a comparison between texts produced by French and Italian politicians on polarizing issues, such as immigration and the European Union, and their chatbot counterparts created with ChatGPT 3.5. In this study, we focus on implicit communication, in particular on presuppositions and their functions in discourse, which have been considered in the literature as a potential linguistic feature of manipulation. This study also aims to contribute to the emerging literature on the pragmatic competences of Large Language Models.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
MethodsFocus
