Ranking probabilistic forecasting models with different loss functions
Tomasz Serafin, Bartosz Uniejewski

TL;DR
This paper proposes new statistical metrics based on pinball loss and empirical coverage to rank probabilistic forecasting models, demonstrating that coverage-based ranking aligns better with economic performance in trading strategies.
Contribution
It introduces novel performance metrics for probabilistic forecast ranking and evaluates their effectiveness in predicting trading profitability.
Findings
Coverage-based ranking correlates with higher trading profits.
Proposed metrics outperform traditional ranking methods.
Quantile coverage is a key indicator of forecast usefulness.
Abstract
In this study, we introduced various statistical performance metrics, based on the pinball loss and the empirical coverage, for the ranking of probabilistic forecasting models. We tested the ability of the proposed metrics to determine the top performing forecasting model and investigated the use of which metric corresponds to the highest average per-trade profit in the out-of-sample period. Our findings show that for the considered trading strategy, ranking the forecasting models according to the coverage of quantile forecasts used in the trading hours exhibits a superior economic performance.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsForecasting Techniques and Applications
