Comparison of Tiny Machine Learning Techniques for Embedded Acoustic Emission Analysis
Uditha Muthumala, Yuxuan Zhang, Luciano Sebastian Martinez-Rau,, Sebastian Bader

TL;DR
This study compares different machine learning approaches for classifying acoustic emission signals on resource-limited IoT devices, highlighting trade-offs between accuracy, speed, memory, and energy use.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive comparison of waveform-based and feature-based ML models for embedded AE analysis, optimizing for deployment constraints.
Findings
All models achieved over 99% accuracy.
Raw signal models are faster and more energy-efficient.
Feature extraction models require more computational resources.
Abstract
This paper compares machine learning approaches with different input data formats for the classification of acoustic emission (AE) signals. AE signals are a promising monitoring technique in many structural health monitoring applications. Machine learning has been demonstrated as an effective data analysis method, classifying different AE signals according to the damage mechanism they represent. These classifications can be performed based on the entire AE waveform or specific features that have been extracted from it. However, it is currently unknown which of these approaches is preferred. With the goal of model deployment on resource-constrained embedded Internet of Things (IoT) systems, this work evaluates and compares both approaches in terms of classification accuracy, memory requirement, processing time, and energy consumption. To accomplish this, features are extracted and…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsImage Processing and 3D Reconstruction · Neural Networks and Applications · Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications
MethodsSPEED: Separable Pyramidal Pooling EncodEr-Decoder for Real-Time Monocular Depth Estimation on Low-Resource Settings · Autoencoders
