Utilizing Low-Cost Sensors to Monitor Indoor Air Quality in Mongolian Gers

TL;DR

This study demonstrates that low-cost sensors can effectively monitor indoor air quality in Mongolian gers, showing that insulation and cleaner heating methods significantly reduce PM2.5 levels, though they often remain above health guidelines.

Contribution

It introduces the use of low-cost sensors for indoor air quality monitoring in Mongolian gers and evaluates the impact of insulation and heating methods on PM2.5 concentrations.

Findings

Insulation reduces PM2.5 by 17.5% to 19.1%.

Electric heating and cooking reduce PM2.5 by 48%.

PM2.5 levels often exceed WHO guidelines.

Abstract

Air quality has important climate and health effects. There is a need, therefore, to monitor air quality both indoors and outdoors. Methods of measuring air quality should be cost-effective if they are to be used widely, and one such method is low-cost sensors (LCS). This study reports on the use of LCSs in Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia, to measure $\mathrm{PM_{2.5}}$ concentrations inside yurts or "gers." Some of these gers were part of a non-government agency (NGO) initiative to improve the insulating properties of these housing structures. The goal of the NGO was to decrease particulate emissions inside the gers; a secondary result was to lower the use of coal and other biomass material. LCSs were installed in gers heated primarily by coal, and interior air quality was measured. Gers that were modified by increasing their insulating capacities showed a 17.5% reduction in $\mathrm{PM_{2.5}}$ concentrations, but these concentrations remained higher than levels recommended by health organizations. Gers that were insulated and used a combination of both coal and electricity showed a 19.1% reduction in $\mathrm{PM_{2.5}}$ concentrations. Insulated gers that used electricity for both heating and cooking showed a 48% reduction in $\mathrm{PM_{2.5}}$, though concentrations were still 6.4 times higher than those recommended by the World Health Organization (WHO). Nighttime and daytime trends followed similar patterns in $\mathrm{PM_{2.5}}$ concentrations with slight variations. It was found that, at nighttime, the outside $\mathrm{PM_{2.5}}$ concentrations were generally higher than the inside concentrations of the gers in this study. This suggests that $\mathrm{PM_{2.5}}$ would flow into the gers whenever the doors were opened, causing spikes in $\mathrm{PM_{2.5}}$ concentrations.