Updating the constraint on the quantum collapse models via kilogram masses
Qi Dai, Haixing Miao, Yiqiu Ma

TL;DR
This paper refines bounds on quantum collapse models using updated acceleration noise data from LISA Pathfinder, and discusses how underground labs could further improve these constraints.
Contribution
It provides improved bounds on CSL and DP collapse model parameters based on new experimental data and explores the potential of underground laboratories for future tests.
Findings
CSL collapse rate bounded to ≤8.3×10⁻¹¹ s⁻¹ at millihertz band
DP model's cutoff scale constrained to ~285.5 fm
Deep-underground labs could tighten CSL bounds to ≤3×10⁻¹¹ s⁻¹
Abstract
Quantum mechanics, which governs all microscopic phenomena, encounters challenges when applied to macroscopic objects that exhibit classical behavior. To address this micro-macro disparity, collapse models such as the Continuous Spontaneous Localization (CSL) and Diosi-Penrose (DP) models have been proposed. These models phenomenologically modify quantum theory to reconcile its predictions with the observed classical behavior of macroscopic systems. Based on previous works\,([Phys.\,Rev\,D,\,95(8):084054\,(2017)] and [Phys.\,Rev.\,D,\,94:124036,\,(2016)]), an improved bound on the collapse model parameters is given using the updated acceleration noise data released from LISA Pathfinder\,([Phys.\,Rev.\,D, 110(4):042004,\,(2024)]). The CSL collapse rate is bounded to be at most \, at the mili-Hertz band when $r_{\rm CSL}=10^{-7}\,{\rm…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsQuantum Mechanics and Applications · Quantum Information and Cryptography
