The belief in Moore's Law is undermining ICT climate action
Adrian Friday, Christina Bremer, Oliver Bates, Christian Remy, Srinjoy, Mitra, Jan Tobias Muehlberg

TL;DR
This paper critically examines how the overconfidence in Moore's Law fosters reliance on digital solutions that may exacerbate environmental and social issues, urging a systemic approach to ICT's climate impacts.
Contribution
It highlights the need to view ICT's environmental impacts as interconnected systems rather than isolated efficiency metrics, emphasizing the social and material costs of semiconductor reliance.
Findings
ICT's growth has significant environmental and social costs.
Techno-solutionism may hinder systemic climate action.
A call for a community to address semiconductor industry impacts.
Abstract
The growth of semiconductor technology is unprecedented, with profound transformational consequences for society. This includes feeding an over-reliance on digital solutions to systemic problems such as climate change ('techno-solutionism'). Such technologies come at a cost: environmental, social and material. We unpack topics arising from "The True Cost of ICT: From Materiality to Techno-Solutionism (TCICT)", a workshop held at the International ICT for Sustainability (ICT4S) conference 2024 in Stockholm, Sweden -- exploring, as a matter of global climate injustice, the drivers and material dependencies of these technologies. We point to the importance of addressing ICT's impacts as a system, rather than purely in terms of efficiency and energy use. We conclude by calling to build a community of like-minded and critical colleagues to address the intersectional climate impacts of the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
Topicsdemographic modeling and climate adaptation
