Are Transformers Truly Foundational for Robotics?
James A. R. Marshall, Andrew B. Barron

TL;DR
This paper critically examines the hype around GPTs for robotics, highlighting their high resource costs and contrasting them with biological systems like insect brains that achieve robust autonomy efficiently.
Contribution
It challenges the assumption that GPTs are inherently suitable for robotics and suggests biological insights can improve robotic AI.
Findings
GPTs require enormous compute and training time
Biological systems achieve autonomy with minimal resources
Lessons from insect brains can inform better robotic AI
Abstract
Generative Pre-Trained Transformers (GPTs) are hyped to revolutionize robotics. Here we question their utility. GPTs for autonomous robotics demand enormous and costly compute, excessive training times and (often) offboard wireless control. We contrast GPT state of the art with how tiny insect brains have achieved robust autonomy with none of these constraints. We highlight lessons that can be learned from biology to enhance the utility of GPTs in robotics.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsRobot Manipulation and Learning · Reinforcement Learning in Robotics
MethodsRefunds@Expedia|||How do I get a full refund from Expedia? · Dropout · Discriminative Fine-Tuning · Linear Layer · Cosine Annealing · Attention Dropout · Layer Normalization · Byte Pair Encoding · Adam · Residual Connection
