A Binary IV Model for Persuasion: Profiling Persuasion Types among Compliers
Zeyang Yu

TL;DR
This paper develops a method using a binary IV model to identify and profile persuasion types among compliers, including voters and non-voters, under certain assumptions, with a test for these assumptions.
Contribution
It introduces a novel approach to identify the joint distribution of potential outcomes among compliers and classify persuasion types using a binary IV model.
Findings
Identifies the joint distribution of potential outcomes among compliers.
Profiles persuasion types: always-voters, never-voters, mobilised voters.
Provides a sharp test for the model's assumptions.
Abstract
In an empirical study of persuasion, researchers often use a binary instrument to encourage individuals to consume information and take some action. We show that, with a binary Imbens-Angrist instrumental variable model and the monotone treatment response assumption, it is possible to identify the joint distribution of potential outcomes among compliers. This is necessary to identify the percentage of mobilised voters and their statistical characteristic defined by the moments of the joint distribution of treatment and covariates. Specifically, we develop a method that enables researchers to identify the statistical characteristic of persuasion types: always-voters, never-voters, and mobilised voters among compliers. These findings extend the kappa weighting results in Abadie (2003). We also provide a sharp test for the two sets of identification assumptions. The test boils down to…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsOpinion Dynamics and Social Influence
