Measuring Statistical Evidence: A Short Report
Mahdi Zamani

TL;DR
This paper discusses the concept of statistical evidence, critiques existing methods, and advocates for the Relative Belief Ratio as a principled approach to measure evidence in statistical inference.
Contribution
It provides a conceptual overview of evidential statistics and introduces the Relative Belief Ratio as a novel, well-motivated method for measuring statistical evidence.
Findings
Critiques of current evidence measurement methods
Introduction of the Relative Belief Ratio as a primary measure
Emphasis on principles for ideal inference methods
Abstract
This short text tried to establish a big picture of what evidential statistics is about and how an ideal inference method should behave. Moreover, by examining shortcomings of some of the currently used methods for measuring evidence and utilizing some intuitive principles, we motivated the Relative Belief Ratio as the primary method of characterizing statistical evidence. Number of topics has been omitted for the interest of this text and the reader is strongly advised to refer to (Evans, 2015) as the primary source for further readings of the subject.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsForecasting Techniques and Applications
