The composition rule for quantum systems is not the only possible one
Marco Erba, Paolo Perinotti

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates that the composition rule in quantum theory is not unique, introducing alternative theories with the same Bell correlation predictions but different system-composition rules, challenging the foundational status of the tensor-product rule.
Contribution
It provides a family of operationally consistent theories differing from quantum theory in their composition rule, showing quantum theory is more than just Bell correlations.
Findings
Alternative composition rules reproduce Bell correlations.
Quantum theory's composition rule is not uniquely determined by Bell tests.
Operationally, quantum theory can be extended beyond the tensor-product rule.
Abstract
Quantum theory provides a significant example of two intermingling hallmarks of science: the ability to consistently combine physical systems and study them compositely, and the power to extract predictions in the form of correlations. A striking consequence of this facet is the violation of Bell inequalities, which has been experimentally demonstrated via Bell tests. The prediction of this phenomenon originates as quantum systems are prescribed to combine according to the composition postulate, i.e. the tensor-product rule. This rule has also an operationally salient formulation given in terms of discriminability of composite states via local measurements. However, both the theoretical and the empirical status of such a postulate have been repeatedly challenged, questioning its independence from other physical principles -- most notably from quantum postulates pertaining solely to…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsHistory and advancements in chemistry
