On $L^1$-$L^2$ dichotomy for flat symmetric spaces
Sanjeev Kumar Gupta, Nico Spronk

TL;DR
This paper investigates the $L^1$-$L^2$ dichotomy for orbital measures on flat symmetric spaces, revealing cases where the dichotomy holds or fails, especially highlighting new phenomena in rank 2 spaces.
Contribution
It extends the understanding of the $L^1$-$L^2$ dichotomy to flat symmetric spaces of ranks 1, 2, and 3, identifying when it holds or fails, including novel results for rank 2 spaces.
Findings
Dichotomy holds for rank 1 spaces except type AI.
Dichotomy holds for regular points in rank 2 and 3 spaces.
Failure of dichotomy observed for certain singular points in rank 2 spaces.
Abstract
For rank 1 flat symmetric spaces, continuous orbital measures admit absolutely continuous convolution squares, except for Cartan type AI. Hence - dichotomy for these spaces holds true in parallel to the compact and non-compact rank 1 symmetric spaces. We also study - dichotomy for flat symmetric spaces of ranks of type AIII, i.e.\ associated with where . For continuous orbital measures given by regular points - dichotomy holds. We study such measures given by certain singular points when , and show that - dichotomy fails. This is the first time such results are observed for any type of symmetric spaces of rank 2.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Mathematical Physics Problems · Advanced Differential Geometry Research · Advanced Mathematical Modeling in Engineering
