On the equivalence of Prony and Lanczos methods for Euclidean correlation functions
Johann Ostmeyer, Aniket Sen, Carsten Urbach

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates the analytical equivalence of the oblique Lanczos method and Prony's method for analyzing Euclidean correlators, highlighting their advantages over traditional approaches despite not solving the signal-to-noise issue.
Contribution
It establishes the equivalence between the oblique Lanczos method and Prony's Generalised Eigenvalue Method for Euclidean correlator analysis.
Findings
Oblique Lanczos and Prony methods are analytically equivalent.
Both methods outperform the standard effective mass approach.
Signal-to-noise problem remains unsolved by these methods.
Abstract
We investigate the oblique Lanczos method recently put forward in arXiv:2406.20009 for analysing Euclidean correlators in lattice field theories and show that it is analytically equivalent to the well known Prony Generalised Eigenvalue Method (PGEVM). Moreover, we discuss that the signal-to-noise problem is not aleviated by either of these two methods. Still, both methods show clear advantages when compared to the standard effective mass approach.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Statistical Methods and Models
