Injection Bias Reduction Techniques in Quantitative Angiography Using Patient-Specific Phantoms of Intracranial Aneurysm

TL;DR

This study evaluates patient-specific phantom-based correction methods to reduce injection bias in quantitative angiography for intracranial aneurysms, improving measurement robustness across different morphologies and injection conditions.

Contribution

It introduces the use of SVD variants and regularization techniques to effectively minimize injection-induced variability in QA parameters using in vitro aneurysm phantoms.

Findings

SVD variants significantly reduce QA parameter variability.

Correction methods improve robustness across different aneurysm sizes and locations.

Quantitative improvements demonstrated in in vitro phantom experiments.

Abstract

In intracranial aneurysm (IA) treatment, digital subtraction angiography (DSA) monitors device-induced hemodynamic changes. Quantitative angiography (QA) provides more precise assessments but is limited by hand-injection variability. This study evaluates correction methods using in vitro phantoms that mimic diverse aneurysm morphologies and locations, addressing the 2D and temporal limitations of DSA. We used a patient-specific phantom to replicate three distinct IA morphologies at various Circle of Willis points: the middle cerebral artery (MCA), anterior communicating artery (ACA), and the internal carotid artery (ICA), each varying in size and shape. The diameters of the IA at MCA, ACA and ICA are 10.1, 10 and 7 millimeters, respectively. QA parameters for both non-stenosed and stenosed conditions were measured with 5ml and 10ml boluses over various injection durations to generate time density curves (TDCs). To address the variability in injection, several singular value decomposition (SVD) variants, standard SVD (sSVD) with Tikhonov regularization, block-circulant SVD (bSVD), and oscillation index SVD (oSVD) were applied. These methods enabled the extraction of IA impulse response function (IRF), peak height (PHIRF), area under the curve (AUCIRF), and mean transit time (MTT). We evaluated the robustness of bias-reducing methods by observing the invariance of these parameters with respect to the injection conditions, and the location and size of the aneurysm. The application of SVD variants, sSVD, bSVD, and oSVD, significantly reduced QA parameter variability due to injection techniques.