AIDBench: A benchmark for evaluating the authorship identification capability of large language models
Zichen Wen, Dadi Guo, Huishuai Zhang

TL;DR
This paper introduces AIDBench, a benchmark for evaluating large language models' ability to identify authorship, revealing privacy risks as LLMs can often correctly attribute anonymous texts to their authors.
Contribution
The paper presents AIDBench, a comprehensive benchmark with novel evaluation methods and a RAG-based approach to assess and enhance LLMs' authorship identification capabilities.
Findings
LLMs can identify authorship significantly better than random chance.
AIDBench covers diverse text types like emails, blogs, and research papers.
The RAG-based method improves authorship attribution, especially with long inputs.
Abstract
As large language models (LLMs) rapidly advance and integrate into daily life, the privacy risks they pose are attracting increasing attention. We focus on a specific privacy risk where LLMs may help identify the authorship of anonymous texts, which challenges the effectiveness of anonymity in real-world systems such as anonymous peer review systems. To investigate these risks, we present AIDBench, a new benchmark that incorporates several author identification datasets, including emails, blogs, reviews, articles, and research papers. AIDBench utilizes two evaluation methods: one-to-one authorship identification, which determines whether two texts are from the same author; and one-to-many authorship identification, which, given a query text and a list of candidate texts, identifies the candidate most likely written by the same author as the query text. We also introduce a…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAuthorship Attribution and Profiling
MethodsFocus
