The impact of recovery rate heterogeneity in achieving herd immunity
Gabriel Turinici

TL;DR
This paper investigates how heterogeneity in recovery rates influences herd immunity, revealing that mean recovery time, not mean recovery rate, determines herd immunity thresholds in SIR and SEIR models.
Contribution
It provides the first theoretical demonstration that mean recovery time, rather than recovery rate, is key for herd immunity in epidemic models with heterogeneous recovery rates.
Findings
Mean recovery rate is unreliable for herd immunity prediction.
Mean recovery time determines herd immunity feasibility.
Results apply to both SIR and SEIR models.
Abstract
Herd immunity is a critical concept in epidemiology, describing a threshold at which a sufficient proportion of a population is immune, either through infection or vaccination, thereby preventing sustained transmission of a pathogen. In the classic Susceptible-Infectious-Recovered (SIR) model, which has been widely used to study infectious disease dynamics, the achievement of herd immunity depends on key parameters, including the transmission rate () and the recovery rate (), where represents the inverse of the mean infectious period. While the transmission rate has received substantial attention, recent studies have underscored the significant role of in determining the timing and sustainability of herd immunity. Additionally, it is becoming increasingly evident that assuming as a constant parameter might oversimplify the dynamics, as…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsHerpesvirus Infections and Treatments · Virology and Viral Diseases · Reproductive tract infections research
