SDSS J102915.14+172927.9: Revisiting the chemical pattern
E. Caffau (GEPI), P. Bonifacio (GEPI), L. Monaco (UNAB), M. Steffen, (AIP), L. Sbordone (ESO), M. Spite (GEPI), P. Fran\c{c}ois (GEPI), A J, Gallagher (AIP), H.-G. Ludwig (LSW), P. Molaro (OAT)

TL;DR
This study re-examines the chemical composition of the extremely metal-poor star SDSS J102915.14+172927.9 using high-resolution spectra, revealing it is not carbon-enhanced and suggesting its formation involved dust cooling or primordial cloud fragmentation.
Contribution
It provides new high-resolution spectral data and refined abundance measurements, especially the low carbon content, challenging previous assumptions about such stars' formation mechanisms.
Findings
Star has low carbon abundance, not enhanced in carbon.
Metallicity is more than 20 times lower than the most iron-poor star.
Possible formation via dust cooling or primordial cloud fragmentation.
Abstract
Context: The small- to intermediate-mass (), most metal-poor stars that formed in the infancy of the Universe are still shining today in the sky. They are very rare, but their discovery and investigation brings new knowledge on the formation of the first stellar generations. Aims: SDSS J102915.14+172927.9 is one of the most metal-poor star known to date. Since no carbon can be detected in its spectrum, a careful upper limit is important, both to classify this star and to distinguish it from the carbon-enhanced stars that represent the majority at these metallicities. Methods: We undertook a new observational campaign to acquire high-resolution UVES spectra. The new spectra were combined with archival spectra in order to increase the signal-to-noise ratio. From the combined spectrum, we derived abundances for seven elements (Mg, Si, Ca, Ti, Fe, Ni, and a tentative Li) and…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
