The Role of Accuracy and Validation Effectiveness in Conversational Business Analytics
Adem Alparslan

TL;DR
This paper explores how conversational business analytics, especially Text-to-SQL technology, can improve data access for end users by balancing AI accuracy and validation effectiveness, with theoretical models and practical insights.
Contribution
It develops theoretical models based on expected utility theory to analyze when partial or full AI support in conversational analytics outperforms human experts.
Findings
Partial AI support can be profitable with high SQL query accuracy.
Full support requires effective validation mechanisms for reliability.
User validation challenges limit the effectiveness of conversational analytics.
Abstract
This study examines conversational business analytics, an approach that utilizes AI to address the technical competency gaps that hinder end users from effectively using traditional self-service analytics. By facilitating natural language interactions, conversational business analytics aims to empower end users to independently retrieve data and generate insights. The analysis focuses on Text-to-SQL as a representative technology for translating natural language requests into SQL statements. Developing theoretical models grounded in expected utility theory, this study identifies the conditions under which conversational business analytics, through partial or full support, can outperform delegation to human experts. The results indicate that partial support, focusing solely on information generation by AI, is viable when the accuracy of AI-generated SQL queries leads to a profit that…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsTechnology Adoption and User Behaviour
