Fine-Grained Uncertainty Quantification via Collisions
Jesse Friedbaum, Sudarshan Adiga, Ravi Tandon

TL;DR
This paper introduces a novel fine-grained uncertainty metric called the collision matrix, which measures class distinguishability in classification tasks and can be estimated using contrastive learning techniques.
Contribution
The paper proposes the collision matrix as a new uncertainty measure, along with methods to estimate it from labeled data using contrastive models and matrix recovery techniques.
Findings
The collision matrix effectively quantifies class confusion.
Contrastive models can estimate the collision matrix from data.
Estimated collision matrix improves class posterior probability estimation.
Abstract
We propose a new and intuitive metric for aleatoric uncertainty quantification (UQ), the prevalence of class collisions defined as the same input being observed in different classes. We use the rate of class collisions to define the collision matrix, a novel and uniquely fine-grained measure of uncertainty. For a classification problem involving classes, the collision matrix measures the inherent difficulty in distinguishing between each pair of classes. We discuss several applications of the collision matrix, establish its fundamental mathematical properties, and show its relationship with existing UQ methods, including the Bayes error rate (BER). We also address the new problem of estimating the collision matrix using one-hot labeled data by proposing a series of innovative techniques to estimate . First, we learn a pair-wise contrastive model which accepts two…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsProbabilistic and Robust Engineering Design · Fault Detection and Control Systems
