Analytical and EZmock covariance validation for the DESI 2024 results
Daniel Forero-S\'anchez, Michael Rashkovetskyi, Ot\'avio Alves, Arnaud de Mattia, Nikhil Padmanabhan, Hee-Jong Seo, Seshadri Nadathur, Ashley J. Ross, Pauline Zarrouk, H\'ector Gil-Mar\'in, Jiaxi Yu, Zhejie Ding, Uendert Andrade, Xinyi Chen, Cristhian Garcia-Quintero

TL;DR
This paper compares analytical and EZmock covariance estimation methods for DESI 2024 cosmological analyses, finding analytical methods suitable for BAO but requiring corrections for Full Shape analyses.
Contribution
It evaluates the effectiveness of analytical and mock-based covariance matrices, recommending the former for BAO and proposing corrections for Full Shape analyses in DESI.
Findings
Analytical covariance performs well for BAO analyses.
Mock covariance is necessary for accurate Full Shape analysis.
Analytical covariance in Fourier space needs correction for Full Shape.
Abstract
The estimation of uncertainties in cosmological parameters is an important challenge in Large-Scale-Structure (LSS) analyses. For standard analyses such as Baryon Acoustic Oscillations (BAO) and Full Shape, two approaches are usually considered. First: analytical estimates of the covariance matrix use Gaussian approximations and (nonlinear) clustering measurements to estimate the matrix, which allows a relatively fast and computationally cheap way to generate matrices that adapt to an arbitrary clustering measurement. On the other hand, sample covariances are an empirical estimate of the matrix based on en ensemble of clustering measurements from fast and approximate simulations. While more computationally expensive due to the large amount of simulations and volume required, these allow us to take into account systematics that are impossible to model analytically. In this work we…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
