BAO vs. SN evidence for evolving dark energy
Alessio Notari, Michele Redi, Andrea Tesi

TL;DR
This paper reviews evidence for evolving dark energy using BAO and SN data, highlighting the influence of supernova datasets and potential systematic offsets that affect the significance of the findings.
Contribution
It critically assesses the robustness of evidence for time-varying dark energy, emphasizing dataset differences and systematic uncertainties impacting the results.
Findings
Evidence for evolving dark energy at 3σ level from BAO and SN data.
Supernova dataset choices significantly influence the dark energy evolution evidence.
Systematic offsets in supernova magnitudes can weaken the evidence for dark energy evolution.
Abstract
We critically review the evidence for time-varying dark energy from recent Baryon Acoustic Oscillations (BAO) and Supernova (SN) observations. First, we show that such evidence is present at the 3 level, even without the new BAO data from the dark energy Spectroscopic Instrument (DESI), by instead using BAO data from the dark energy Survey (DES), combined with the DES5Y supernovae and Planck CMB data. Next, we examine the role of the DES5Y supernova dataset, showing that the preference for time-varying dark energy is driven by the low redshift supernovae common to both the DES5Y and Pantheon+ compilations. We find that combining Pantheon+ and DES5Y supernovae by removing the common supernovae leads to two different results, depending on whether they are removed from the DES5Y or the Pantheon+ catalog, leading to stronger or weaker exclusion of CDM, at the (3.8)…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsCosmology and Gravitation Theories · Dark Matter and Cosmic Phenomena · Astronomy and Astrophysical Research
